Team Practices
Slack Conflict Playbook: How We Use an AI Mediator to Turn Threads into Team Agreements
A practical guide to resolve Slack conflict with an AI mediator. Our playbook, templates, and lessons to turn messy threads into clear team agreements.
August 9, 2025
7 min read
Mia Chen, Disputly
Slack Conflict Playbook: How We Use an AI Mediator to Turn Threads into Team Agreements
Slack conflict is part of real work. It can sharpen ideas or drain energy. We built Disputly as an AI mediator inside Slack, so teams can stop nonsense arguments, focus on core issues, and reach clear team agreements. In this playbook we share how we handle dispute resolution in Slack with simple habits, short templates, and a steady use of Disputly when threads start to wobble.
#
Why Slack arguments spiral
We see the same patterns across engineering and product threads. When a thread derails, it is usually because of one or more of these causes:
Slack conflict is not the enemy. The problem is a lack of structure. A light structure inside the thread turns heat into progress.
#
Our three step flow for dispute resolution in Slack
This is the flow we use when a thread gets stuck. It is simple and fast, and it keeps the work inside Slack.
1) Call a pause
2) Ask Disputly for a neutral summary
3) Move to a decision format
Here is the exact decision template we drop into threads:
Context: one paragraph on what problem we are solving
Options:
1) Option A
2) Option B
Tradeoffs:
• A: what we gain, what we risk • B: what we gain, what we risk Decision owner: name
Inputs needed: who and by when
Time box: until
Plan to revisit: what signal would trigger a change
Final decision:
This keeps Slack conflict contained and moves the group to a clear team agreement.
#
What Disputly does in the thread
Disputly is an AI mediator that works inside Slack. In our flow we rely on it for a few specific jobs:
We do not expect Disputly to replace judgment or leadership. It creates clarity so humans can decide.
#
Three real patterns and how we handled them
##
Naming rules fight in a codebase
A short thread on naming rules became a long back and forth. The stated issue was style. The real issue was test flakiness from inconsistent patterns.
What helped:
##
Cross team dependency and a missed deadline
Infra and frontend argued over a service change and a delivery date. The thread mixed reliability targets with a feature launch.
What helped:
##
Product priority tug of war
Growth and core product debated where to spend a small design block. It kept circling.
What helped:
#
Prompts and micro scripts we use in Slack
We keep prompts short and concrete. Here are a few lines that work well for us:
@channel Pause for framing. I will ask Disputly to summarize the thread into positions, interests, constraints, and open questions.
Disputly, summarize this thread in 6 bullet points:
• positions • interests • constraints • open questions • shared ground • risks if we delay
Disputly, propose 3 balanced options with tradeoffs. Keep each option to 3 lines.
Here is our decision template. Please fill the context and tradeoffs from the summary.
If you are not sure what to ask, start with summarize the thread and list the open questions. That alone can unblock a lot of Slack conflict.
#
Team safeguards that prevent rework
#
When not to use an AI mediator
There are threads where a human should lead. We avoid Disputly for private feedback, performance topics, and personal conflicts. Use a manager or an HR partner in those cases.
#
What we learned so far
#
Try this next
Slack conflict will not vanish. With a simple flow and a steady AI mediator, you can turn threads into clear team agreements and keep shipping.
Enjoyed this article?
Join our beta to get early access to AI-powered team dispute resolution. Be the first to know when we launch new features.